More than outcomes: A cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent research has cast some doubt on the general validity of outcome-based models of social preferences. We develop a model based on cognitive dissonance that focuses on the importance of self-image. An experiment (a dictator game variant) tests the model. First, we find that subjects whose choices involve two psychologically inconsistent cognitions indeed report higher levels of experienced conflict and take more time for their decisions (our proxies for cognitive dissonance). Second, we find support for the main model components. An individual’s self-image, the sensitivity to cognitive dissonance, and expected behavior of others have a positive effect on other-regarding behavior. JEL classifications: C72, C91, D03, D80
منابع مشابه
Jena Economic Research Papers Do I Really Want to Know? a Cognitive Dissonance-based Explanation of Other- regarding Behavior Do I Really Want to Know? a Cognitive Dissonance-based Explanation of Other-regarding Behavior
We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a dictator game variant subjects can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of subjects showing other-regarding behavior when the payoffs of the receiver are known, choose to ignore these consequences if possible. This behav...
متن کاملDo I Really Want to Know? A Cognitive Dissonance-Based Explanation of Other-Regarding Behavior
We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a dictator game variant subjects can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of subjects showing other-regarding behavior when the payoffs of the receiver are known, choose to ignore these consequences if possible. This behav...
متن کاملCognitive Dissonance or Credibility?: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Explanations for Selective Exposure to Partisan News
Selective exposure research indicates that news consumers tend to seek out attitudeconsistent information and avoid attitude-challenging information. This study examines online news credibility and cognitive dissonance as theoretical explanations for partisan selective exposure behavior. After viewing an attitudinally consistent, challenging, or politically balanced online news source, cognitiv...
متن کاملEffects of affective and cognitive empathy induction on couples’ behavior and outcomes in conflicts
The current study investigated the effect of affective and cognitive empathy induction on couples’ behavior and outcomes in conflicts. The research design was experimental. The sample consisted of 48 couples who were selected based on convenience sampling method and assigned into experimental groups (cognitive empathy and emotional empathy) and control group randomly. In order to measure variab...
متن کاملIs observed other - regarding behavior always genuine ? by Astrid Matthey Tobias
We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a social dilemma situation (a dictator game variant), people can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of the people that show other-regarding behavior when the payoffs of the receiver are known chose to ignore them if poss...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011